BLO 8

When Pollan approached this sitauation on how are meat is made he did it in a very reasonable way. He displayed both sides of the situation. He showed the negatives and he showed the postives to how the animals and our meat were being treating and how they were killed. I agree with his theory on this because I think you should approach a situation with an open mind like he did. He really allowed both sides to telll there story without really adding his two cents into it. But the one animal that really bothered me that was being killed was the chicken. The way Pollan describrs how it was basically tortured and just left to die wasnt really a hummane way to live. They would just hang the chickens up to bleed out after they cut them which kinda mad me relate to this animal the most because I belive in eating meat and animals but I think it should at leas be done in a humae or at least a less violent way. But his theory of appraoching a situation with an open mind I best relate to because I believe if you do that you will be able to get the full facts of both sides of the arguement like he did/